Tamara Curovic vs Ida Jarlskog Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Curovic vs I. Jarlskog

Tamara Curovic
SRB
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
30
Age
27
-
Height
-
809
C. Rank
Ret.
394
Best Rank
729
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Ida Jarlskog
SWE
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
30
Age
27
-
Height
-
809
C. Rank
Ret.
394
Best Rank
729
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-To-Head: Curovic 0 - 0 Jarlskog
The last match between Tamara Curovic and Ida Jarlskog was at the Hammamet, 16-12-2016, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory w/o.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Curovic | 0 |
Jarlskog | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(QF) Hammamet(12-16-16)
Tamara Curovic
w/o
Ida Jarlskog
T. Curovic vs I. Jarlskog H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
54.49% (376-314) | Career Total W/L | 60.71% (68-44) |
8 | Titles | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Curovic vs I. Jarlskog Match Preview
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tamara Curovic has won 41.54% of points on their second serve, while Ida Jarlskog has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tamara Curovic, in recent form, has won 48.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ida Jarlskog has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.29% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tamara Curovic has saved 52.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ida Jarlskog has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tamara Curovic has won 40.00% of matches played (W/L 2/ 3), with Ida Jarlskog winning 0% (W/L 2/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tamara Curovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 234/ 193), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Ida Jarlskog has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 9/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 45/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Tamara Curovic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 2/ 3), where as Ida Jarlskog has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tamara Curovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 165.4 while Ida Jarlskog has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tamara Curovic has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ida Jarlskog has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tamara Curovic has converted 55.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ida Jarlskog has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Tamara Curovic vs Ida Jarlskog Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Curovic 43%, Jarlskog 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Curovic 50%, Jarlskog 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Curovic 48%, Jarlskog 0%.
T. Curovic Recent Matches Played
I. Jarlskog Recent Matches Played

T. Curovic vs I. Jarlskog Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
54.49% (376/314) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.71% (68/44) |
54.31% (844/710) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.98% (149/108) |
52.28% (7274/6640) | Games Win/Loss | 54.42% (1218/1020) |
50.57% (88/86) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.29% (9/5) |
54.80% (234/193) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.21% (45/31) |
62.35% (53/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.64% (14/8) |
25.00% (1/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
707 | Aces Total | 42 |
0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
2348 | Total Double Faults | 145 |
1:2:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
170.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 557.51 |
58% (15378/26452) | 1st Serve % | 68% (2916/4268) |
61% (9422/15378) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (1654/2916) |
43% (4743/11076) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (632/1351) |
51% (1744/3441) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (292/605) |
48% (12299/25538) | Return Points Win % | 48% (1996/4146) |
0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
41.04% (87/125) | Challenger W/L | 53.33% (16/14) |
60.59% (289/188) | Futures W/L | 64.20% (52/29) |
55% (372/671) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (66/110) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
47% (54/116) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (8/16) |
51% (96/188) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (19/33) |
87% (379/330) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (69/59) |
13% (379/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (69/10) |
15% (310/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (43/9) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
03:05 PM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.15
W2
1.64
11:30 AM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.3
W2
1.62
08:00 AM 21/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.62
W2
1.49
06:00 PM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.071
W2
6.75
06:00 PM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
4.7
W2
1.151
04:30 PM 20/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.49
W2
2.48
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
08:30
H2H 5-2
10:20
H2H 1-2
08:30
H2H 0-2
10:50
H2H 0-2
08:00
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Chengdu Open - Chengdu
China
Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou
China
Laver Cup - San Francisco
United States
Bad Waltersdorf Challenger
Austria
Columbus Challenger
United States
St. Tropez Challenger
France
Targu Mures 2 Challenger
Romania
Villa Maria Challenger
Argentina
M15 Fayetteville
United States
M15 Hurghada
Egypt
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Londrina
Brazil
M25 Nevers
France
M25 Setubal
Portugal